Article by: Francesco Colavita, Global Vice President PreSales Consulting, JAGGAER
Across Saudi Arabia’s capital markets, ESG is no longer a peripheral conversation.
What began as guidance has evolved into a set of expectations that increasingly
influence how companies are assessed by investors, lenders and commercial
partners. Rather than a sudden regulatory shift, this change reflects a steady
recalibration of what “good governance” and long-term value creation now look like in the Kingdom.
Over the past several years, Saudi authorities and market institutions have created
a clearer structure around ESG disclosure. Early guidance from the Capital
Market Authority (CMA) signalled the direction of travel, while the Saudi
Exchange (Tadawul) later provided listed companies with a more defined ESG
disclosure framework aligned with international standards. Most recently, the
CMA’s 2025 framework for green, social, sustainability and sustainability-linked debt instruments (GSS / SLB) has further embedded ESG considerations into capital markets, particularly where financing is linked to environmental or social outcomes.
While ESG disclosure remains voluntary on paper, the direction is unmistakable.
Expectations are being shaped not only by regulators, but by the market itself.
Investors want comparability, lenders want visibility into risk, and supply-chain partners want assurance that ESG commitments extend beyond corporate statements.
The question for Saudi companies is no longer whether to disclose ESG data
but how to use it to create lasting business value delivering compliance, transparency, and tangible outcomes for all stakeholders.
Saudi Companies Know What to Report, The Gap Is in What Comes Next One.of the defining strengths of the Saudi ESG landscape is clarity. Tadawul’s ESG
disclosure framework gives companies a strong sense of what to report, how to
structure disclosures and which metrics to track. Importantly, this guidance aligns closely with global standards, helping Saudi issuers communicate.effectively with international investors and stakeholders.
Yet clarity does not automatically translate into maturity. Despite clear frameworks, ESG adoption across Saudi firms remains uneven. As recently as 2023, only a small proportion of listed companies had formal sustainability
reports, with some estimates suggesting that fewer than 10% were reporting in a structured way. Reporting has accelerated since then, but much of that progress still reflects a focus on disclosure rather than much more.
In many organisations, ESG metrics are collected, published and subsequently archived, but not embedded into day-to-day decision-making. They sit alongside the business, rather than inside it. Procurement decisions, supplier risk management, ethical compliance, supply chain visibility, capital allocation and executive accountability often continue to operate independently of ESG insights.
This.is the real inflection point for Saudi companies. The challenge is no longer
defining ESG KPIs, but translating those KPIs into tools that influence how the business is run. That transition requires moving from static reporting to actionable ESG scorecards.
Where Value Is Actually Created
ESG.KPIs only deliver value when they are integrated witoperational,legal,.environmental and financial data. Standalone sustainability reports, however well produced, rarely change behaviour on their own. What drives action is visibility of opportunities, prioritisation and accountability.
Integrated ESG scorecards provide that missing link. By placing ESG indicators alongside traditional measures of cost, performance and risk, organisations can make more informed trade-offs. A supplier’s emissions profile, ethical compliance, labour practices or governance record becomes part of the same decision framework as price, reliability and continuity of supply.
Well-designed scorecards also allow organisations to focus on what matters most. Clear red, amber and green thresholds help leaders distinguish between issues that require immediate intervention and those that can be monitored over time. Scenario
planning then becomes possible, enabling companies to assess how factors such
as carbon pricing, water scarcity or supply-chain disruption could affect margins, resilience and access to capital.
In this way, ESG scorecards are not reporting tools. They are the driver of informed and recommended decision making. They are where disclosure is translated into business and value outcomes.
ESG Ratings, Capital Access, and the Supply Chain Reality
While internal scorecards shape decision-making, external perception is increasingly
shaped by ESG ratings. Ratings agencies aggregate disclosures, questionnaires
and controversy data into scores that different stakeholders use as shorthand
for risk and performance.
Equity investors tend to rely on financially material, sector-based ratings such as
those produced by MSCI and Sustainalytics to compare companies against peers
and assess long-term risk exposure. Lenders often look to climate-focused
frameworks such as the Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP) to understand transition
readiness and environmental risk. Meanwhile, buyers and procurement teams place
growing weight on supply-chain-focused assessments, such as EcoVadis, when
evaluating suppliers.
This distinction matters. Even where ESG ratings are not directly investor-facing,
they can still have a material impact on commercial outcomes. In procurement
ecosystems, ESG assessments are increasingly a prerequisite for participation
in tenders, bidding evaluation, order issuing
or inclusion on preferred supplier lists.
As a result, companies cannot rely on polished narratives alone. They need
reliable, auditable ESG data at supplier level, connected to procurement and risk processes. Without that operational backbone, ESG commitments are difficult to defend, and even harder to scale as expectations rise.
Saudi ESG Maturity Will Be Defined by Execution, Not Disclosure
Saudi.Arabia has laid strong ESG foundations. Disclosure frameworks are in place,
guidance is clear, and capital-markets mechanisms increasingly reward credible
sustainability performance. The next phase of ESG maturity will be defined not by how much companies disclose, but by how effectively they execute.
For procurement and supply-chain leaders, the implication is clear. ESG must be
embedded at the core of supplier relationships, sourcing decisions and
performance management and transactional
procurement, not treated as a parallel reporting exercise.Doing so strengthens resilience, supports investor confidence and creates a more durable basis for long-term growth.
This is where technology and data integration become critical enablers. Platforms
that connect ESG insights with supplier intelligence, transactional data and
executive dashboards allow organisations to move from obligation to advantage.
By integrating ESG metrics into everyday procurement and management workflows,
companies can meet rising expectations while making better, faster and more
informed decisions.
In a market where ESG expectations are accelerating, execution, rather than just
reporting, will be the true differentiator.
English